Monday, November 14, 2011

The American, directed by Anton Corbijn and the almost imediant resurrection of my movie blog

Hey guys,
In case you missed my last post, I was planning on killing my movie blog. I am pleased to inform you that this is no longer happening. : D Although I will continue to review movies, I will no loner do so weekly, rather I will make a certain number of posts a month (around 4). I also have seperated my movie blog posts from my Computer Programming posts by creating a new blog soely for my movie reviews. If you are interested in visiting my movie blog, see the link at the top of this page. From now on this will be the last movie review on this blog, all of the future reviews will be on my new blog. I was going to stop reviewing movies due to my lack of time/effort but I almost immediately regretted my actions, for I already miss reviewing movies. So, without further ado... this week's movie is;

The American, directed by Anton Cornijn

After I saw The American a couple of weeks ago, I wasn't quite sure what to think. I remember watching it and being fairly impressed with the cinematography and implements of mise en scene, but after the film I realized that pretty much nothing had happened during the entire movie. I later read a review on IMDb that described this movie perfectly as, "a masterfully crafted film about nothing." This is basically exactly how I feel about this movie. 

The American is a story about an american assassin who goes by Senior Farfalla (Mr. Butterfly) who is visiting Italy to complete his final job before retirement. The entire movie basically follows him around as he does various day to day activities, with no real plot development. He soon realizes that he is being followed, after which several attempts at his life were made. You discover that his boss is trying to kill him, and then he does. That basically sums the movie up. The only other detail I can think of is that he falls in love with a prostitute and you see her boobies a lot. The movie ends with him being shot as he goes to meet his girlfriend, and he dies as soon as he gets to her. 

This linear plot would have been lacking for a short film. It leaves the viewer thinking, wait...what just happened? It only takes you a couple of minutes to realize that nothing happened. I hardly think that a few shots of a man eating in a restaurant, having sex with his girlfriend/prostitute and walking to his car can make an entire movie.

I would give this movie a 4.9 on the SMS, it's few points earned because of the frequent textbook examples of quality film making that you rarely see in movies anymore. In my opinion, Anton Corbijn made a great film but forgot the movie part of it. Yes there is a difference. 

This has been a movie review by Severin, the somewhat informed movie critic. Stay safe America, and keep watching movies.

Real Steel, directed by Shawn Levy

Greetings,
This is the 10 week anniversary of my movie blog! I have reviewed/analyzed 10 movies so far. If you haven't read all of my posts and would like to, go to the blog archive underneath my movie list on the side of your screen. Thanks for all of you who read!

This has also been the 10th week of computer programming. We just finished working in Scratch, which I must say I have mixed feelings about. Scratch was fun in a way because it was so easy, but I'm not really sure how practical it is. We also just started working in Jeroo, which I am new to so have no informed opinion on the matter.  So far I am enjoying the class and look forwards to what we do next.

About a week ago I went to the movies, which is somewhat of a treat for me because I don't get to go that often. I really enjoy the theater experience and wish I could go more often. Anyways, now that I am done with my horror theme, I decided to review the movie that I saw. This week's movie is:

Real Steel, directed by Shawn Levy


In all honesty, there really isn't that much to be said for this movie. Real Steel, while entertaining, was basically made to be a crowd pleaser and not much else. The plot was fairly linear, and told the classic story of an underdog boxer (who in this case is a robot named Atom) who fights his way up to the big leagues. Early on in the story, we also learn that the ex-boxer who trains Atom (Charlie) has a son who's mother recently died. Charlie agrees to take care of the boy for a short time until the boys Aunt and Uncle get back from vacation and take custody of him.

The boy finds an old sparring robot and becomes determined to teach it how to fight, confident that this old machine has the potential for greatness. From this point on it's fairly obvious what is going to happen.  The boy coerces his father into teaching the bot (Atom) some basic moves, and ultimately lands the bot a fight. As the fights grow in number, the father and son reluctantly bond as you expected from the start. Atom gathers a large crowd and eventually fights the champion bot, a massive robot name Zeus. This is one of the few parts of the movie that surprised me: Atom looses. After a solid hour and a half of hype building up to this one fight, Atom ties with Zeus in the match, neither dropping out. The win is then decided by Judges, who give Zeus slightly higher score. Even though they won, Charlie and his son treat it like a win. The crowd boos the Judges and Charlie, his son and Atom leave the arena like champions.

As I said before, although this film might be lacking in the cinematic point of view, to be fair that isn't really what it was designed for. Looking at it from the point of view of what it was trying to accomplish (entertain the audience) I thought it was fairly successful. The movie was captivating and has a comforting story line. Its familiar cast (Hugh Jackman and Evangeline Lilly) provided an above par performance and was generally a generic crowd pleaser.

One thing that I did enjoy about this movie was the modesty of the time venue. The film was supposedly based in the near future, and did so believably. The robot boxers, some slightly alien looking cars and futuristic cell phones were really the only alterations made to the world of the characters. I appreciated this lack of flare in contrast to many of the modern movies that go all out on special effects and what-not. I also found the idea of having robot boxers to be especially plausible because robots can give a better fight and literally tear each other to pieces, where humans cannot. Also, people already watch dog fights and chicken fights and things of that sort, so why not robots?

Overall I think I would give this movie a 6.9 on the SMS because it was entertaining, but just that. I think it was good, but far from perfect. I would recommend it to the average movie goer, but if you are offended by anything considered to be a "trash movie", then I would think twice before watching it. This has been a movie review by Severin: the somewhat informed movie critic. Stay safe America, and keep watching movies.

The Exorcist, directed by William Friedkin

Hey guys,
It's the last week of October, and you all know what that means. But before I get started talking about my favorite horror movie of all time, let me get some stuff out of the way. We've been messing around with Scratch in computer programming for the past couple of weeks. It's ok, I mean it's really easy and pretty straight forwards, but I don't really see where we're going with it so far. It seems like we're going to start wrapping it up pretty soon, so I look forwards to what we do next.

Anyways, this week's post will conclude the series of horror movies that I have been reviewing in celebration of the October season. Today I will talk about a movie that left one of the most memorable marks on the American people out of any movie. Do be warned, the material covered in this movie is fairly controversial, and if you are easily offended by religious references to the anti-christ, satanistic beings or explicitly violent depiction of little girls, please navigate away from this page. Without further ado, this week's movie is:

The Exorcist, directed by William Friedkin

The Exorcist was released in 1973, and contains some of the most visually disturbing images I have ever seen. Even by today's standards, this is over the top; I can't imagine what people would have thought in the 70's.

Naratively speaking, this movie doesn't do much. A young girl is possessed by some sort of demon, and after months of doctors visits her mother calls a priest to do an exorcism in order to expel the demon. Simple enough. But when you factor in the sheer amount of graphic chaos depicted in this film, I don't know if the viewer could have handled much more. I think that the simplicity of the plot was one of the few comforting aspects of this movie.

I've already referenced the extreme use of special effects several times. This is what really made this movie something special. That, and the sheer balls that Friedkin must have had to go as far as he did with this movie. As the little girl (Regan MacNeil) becomes progressively worse, her flesh begins to rot, and severe lacerations on her face become infected and her eyes yellow, giving her the appearance of a zombie more than a human being. The majority of the disturbing peices of this film revolve around Regan and her self mutilation while under the influence of what claims to be the Devil. In one scene, Regan is shown forcefully stabbing her self in her vagina with a metal crucifix, and then shoves her mothers face into her bleeding private area. One of the most famous scenes in the movie is when Regan's head turns completely around to speak to someone behind her. There is also a scene in an extended version of the film where Regan "crab-walks" backwards down her staircase and then vomits blood. These are the kind of extreme, over the top moments that make this movie truly unforgettable, no matter how hard one tries.

Another thing that really made this movie was how purely controversial it was. Many people were offended by this extreme interpretation of the Devil and how the movie dealt with God. The movie also included hints that the Catholic church, while rarely, participated in exorcisms even in the current day and age, and just kept it under wraps, as it could be seen as an embarrassment. This added to the edge of the film, making it even more adult.

But this was not just a crowd pleaser, The Exorcist was nominated for many many awards that year in both the Academy Awards and the Oscars, and was the only horror movie to ever receive Best Picture nomination until The Silence of the Lambs, in 1991 (see previous post). It is rare that a horror movie receive such praise, because I think that often directors forget about quality cinematography while trying to hard to please the audience, especially with horror movies. Part of the reason I believe horror movies get such a bad reputation for being terrible movies is because more times then not, the sole purpose of the movie is to scare the viewer, not to make the viewer think about things in a new way or to introduce the viewer to something new. I think that a truly good movie, while entertaining, should also contain a little more depth then just being scary.

The main theme that I picked up on in The Exorcist was the struggle between good and evil. In the opening sequence, the film shows and elderly priest at an archaeological dig in Iraq. The intense labor, extreme heat and dark red sun makes the dig seem like some sort of hellish expedition. The elderly priest named Father Merrin witnesses several bad omens himself; almost getting run over by a carriage, two dogs fighting, and a pendulum clock that suddenly stops mid-swing. This somewhat abstract beginning gives a sense of dark foreboding for the rest of the film.

A discovery at the dig produces a small stone figurine of some sort of monster, which, while never revealed in the movie, is a statue of the Babylonian god Pazuzu, the king of wind demons. Pazuzu's image is seen several times later in the film, one of which is in Regan's bedroom. Regan seems to revel in the presence of this demonic figure. Although the demon that possesses Regan claims to be the Devil, it is implied that it is actually Pazuzu that possesses her.

The fact that a girl as sweet and innocent as Regan is possessed by a demon in ironic and adds the the theme of good vs. evil. The struggle between the two forces is finally put to an end when Father Karras (another priest involved with the exorcism) demands to be possessed by the demon instead of Regan. When the demon leaps into Karras' body, he leaps out the bedroom window, killing himself and the demon within, showing that no one side can win in this eternal struggle.

After recently watching this movie, I am very impressed with it. Friedkin did an excellent job with this piece and it is now one of my favorite movies of all time. I would give The Exorcist a 9.5 on the SMS and would highly recommend it to any who are prepared to see it. This has been a movie review by Severin: the somewhat informed movie critic. Stay safe America, and keep watching movies.

The Silence of the Lambs, directed by Jonathan Demme

Good evening America,
Welcome to my blog. We now have 2 weeks until the end of October, which means that after this there is only 1 more blog post in my horror series this month. I have a very special movie saved for next week, so stay tuned. This weeks movie is:

The Silence of the Lambs, directed by Jonathan Demme

The Silence of the Lambs is a psychological horror movie released in 1991 and includes the eternally infamous Hannibal Lecter. Following FBI agent Clarice Starling , Silence tells the story of a young woman who is a student at a Bureau training facility. Showing promise, she is pulled from her training to consult the incarcerated serial killer and cannibal, Hannibal Lecter, with hopes that he can provided assistance in the investigation of another serial murderer nicknamed Buffalo Bill, who starves and skins his victims.

Silence won a significant amount of awards following its release, not just because 1991 was a relatively uneventful year, but because of the stunning performances put on by the cast. In my opinion this movie has some of the best performances of all time; namely the legendary show put on by Anthony Hopkins, who played Hannibal Lecter. Hopkins' acting was truly stunning. His chilling, cruel and almost fatherly figure makes to be one of the most rememberable quazi-villian of all time.

I say quazi-villian because although Hannibal is a true monster, he aids our protagonist in her investigation and ultimately leads to the capture and death of Buffalo Bill. In the relationship he builds with Clarice, he even begins to look out after her even when it doesn't directly benefit himself. In this way Hannibal becomes Clarice's guardian angle, which is extremely ironic with Hannibal being who he is.

This irony plays into a main theme of the movie: split personalities. Clarice is a female hero, a rarity in modern movies with a mood such as this. Even more so, she works in a male dominated environment, and constantly struggles to prove herself as macho as her male counterparts. On top of that, she is still trying to forget the painful memories of her childhood that she reveals to Hannibal. These things together give Clarice a kind of identity problem of her own: a female needing to be masculine, an adult trying to leave behind her childhood. This is one of the reasons I think that Clarice and Hannibal bond in the way that they do, is because they're both dealing with their inner demons, just in hugely different ways.

Then, of course, there's Buffalo Bill. His real name is Jame Gumb, he's a transvestite, and he kills people. He is obsessed with women, so much to the point that he has a vagina and kidnaps women, starves them for three days, and the skins them in order to make a suit of human skin. Basically your typical dude. His split personalities are hopefully self explanatory, and similar to Clarice, they are related to gender.

This movie is one of my all time favorites, and I happily give it a 9.5 on the SMS, for it deserves every point it can get. This is a great movie and, while creepy, is recommended to all. This has been a movie review by Severin, the semi-informed movie critic. Stay safe America, and keep watching movies.

Jaws, directed by Stephen Spielberg

Hello America, and welcome to the 2nd week of October. This weeks movie is one of the grand-daddy's of horror movies, and tormented hundreds of people after it's release. This week's movie is:

Jaws, directed by Stephen Spielberg



Jaws is one of the most infamous American horror movies of all time which follows sheriff Martin Brody as a giant great white shark terrorizes the waters of his coastline town. This quickly became a classic horror movie because of the mass panic it produced, for the films depiction of the shark scared people from open bodies of water for a long period of time after this movie was released.

One of the many things that made this movie so scary to most people was the presentation of the shark, or the lack there of. You rarely caught a glimpse of the shark for the majority of the film. Only until the do you see the entire shark, and even then, only for a moment. This aspect of the film inspired modern horror movie making as it is today, less is more. Originally when Spielberg was directing the film, he wanted to show as much of the shark as possible; but due to technical difficulties with the mechanical shark with which they were filming the movie, he wound up with less footage then desired. He then took it to his editor, Verna Fields, who used even less. When approached by Spielberg, Fields claimed that the less of the shark that you saw, the better. She wound up being spot on, for all the audience really wants to see is the shark, and saving it for the end keeps the watcher at bay and much more vulnerable.

This movie is most famous for its theme music. The "Jaws tune" is well known to every person in America, and was one of the key things that made this movie truly scary. The low pitch, tortuously slow theme gradually picks up pace as the shark approaches it's victim. Escalating into a fast pace the music suddenly stops as the shark attacks his victim. This tune quickly becomes a warning sign to the viewer about what is about to happen. The track almost sounds like a heart beat, the slow going at first, the acceleration as the suspense heightens and its sudden stop as the person is killed.

This film was also very influential to film making in itself. In the memorable scene "Blood on the Beach" (the beach attack scene where the young boy is killed) Spielberg employs the use of something called the "Truck Shot" or "Tracking Zoom" when showing Brody's reaction to witnessing the shark attack. This type of shot was invented by Alfred Hitchcock while filming Vertigo and is done by zooming in while pulling back (moving the camera backwards) at and equal speed, or the opposite (zooming out while dollying in) and results in distorting the background around a character while the character stays unaltered. Although Spielberg did not invent it, its inclusion in Jaws was one of the first modern uses of it since Vertigo, thus Jaws is often given credit for the invention of said shot.

Another aspect of this film that became a horror icon was the movie poster. This relatively simple poster has stayed in the minds of thousands of American's after seeing this movie and is one of the most easily recognized posters of modern film making. Besides the magnificent representation of the shark approaching the woman, this poster employs many more subtle Easter eggs that make this poster even more disturbing to your subconscious. Other than simply the massive scale of the shark, the word JAWS are just as disturbing.

First, the disturbing diagonal line seems to slash between the A and W. Diagonal lines are often used by directors to make something disturbing. Psychologists have confirmed that the human subconscious by nature, "wants" to straighten out the lines and make the horizontal. This was a tool frequently used by Alfred Hitchcock, namely in his infamous "Hitchcock Staircases," in which he would strongly emphasize diagonal shadows and such. Also, the negative space around the W almost looks like gnashing teeth, perhaps those of a Great White Shark. And finally, the end of the J is cut to resemble a fish hook, hinting at the plot of the movie.

Personally, I loved this movie. I thought it did a great job of capturing the viewers attention and really stuck in your mind even long after the movie was over. I would give Jaws a 9.3 on the SMS, and would highly recommend it to anyone who asks.

This has been a movie analysis by Severin: the somewhat informed movie critic. Stay safe America, and keep watching movies.

Psycho, directed by Alfred Hitchcock

Welcome welcome welcome to the first week of October! Because of the turning of fall and the anticipation of Halloween I have decided to do a month long blog-post theme: Horror Movies! Now personally I am not a huge fan of horror movies, but am aware of more than enough good ones to keep all of your movie needs satisfied. So, without further ado, this weeks movie is:

Psycho, directed by Alfred Hitchcock


I can honestly admit that I have truly bitten off more than I can chew for this one. Alfred Hitchcock is most likely the most famous director of all time and was undeniably great at what he did. Psycho was his master piece, and everything that he had been working for throughout his entire career was leading up to this one movie. People have literally written their dissertations of Psycho and I personally have known people that spent years studying this film. I, being only a highschooler and it being a Tuesday night, will only be able to talk about a tiny tiny tiny tiny fragment of what is going on behind the scenes of this film. To find a true professionals analysis of this movie I highly encourage all of you to simply Google "Psycho film analysis," because there is some truly phenomenal work out there. If you have not scene this movie then stop reading this right now and go watch this movie. And now I must analyze...here I go. 

*AGAIN: IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THIS MOVIE THEN TURN AWAY NOW*

Psycho, as previously stated, was Hitchcock's masterpiece. Filmed in 1960, Psycho was filmed in black and white, even though colored film had existed for quite some time  by that point. Part of the reason that it was filmed in black and white was because it was cheap. Hitchcock always preferred to film in black and white anyways, feeling that color film was unnecessary and that it took away from the film itself. He was attracted to the contrast that black and white could offer and enjoyed playing with the stark shadows and symbolism between light and dark that would be less apparent in colored films. He also felt that it would be far to gory if he filmed it in color, so reverted to black and white to spare the excess violence.

Psycho was actually based off of a novel by the same title written by Robert Bloch. The novel was also, in fact, based off of true events to a certain extent. In short, a man by the name of Ed Gein robbed graves and murdered people to serve his necrophilia and transvestite desires and also to decorate his house with the various body parts of his victims. He also made many clothing accessories out of human skin or other human features that he would wear around the house (I will talk about Silence of the Lambs later this month). Oh, and he also kept his mother's corpse hanging from the ceiling, the head was, of course, separated and hung on a wall. Even as watered down as Hitchcock made it, this story has haunted people for the past 50 years. 

The story outline of Psycho is much less gruesome, but gruesome still. The story revolves around Marion Crane, a young woman working as a real-estate secretary. Her and her boyfriend Sam are living in separate cities, only seeing each other on occasion but dreaming for a future together. 

Marion later steals $40,000 dollars (a lot of money in the 60's) from a client of her office. She leaves town, without contacting anyone, in hopes of reaching Sam's place which was a couple of days drive away from her town of residence (Phoenix, Arizona). She sleeps in her car on the side of the road that night, only to be waken by a police officer in the morning. She tries to shrug him away, but he follows her into town. Becoming frantic, Marion quickly buys a new car at a in town dealer in hopes of losing the cop. She continues her trip to Sam's, still unannounced. 

When night falls again, she this time stops at the Bates Motel, a motel on the outskirts of town run by a local boy named Norman Bates and his mother, only to be known as Mrs. Bates. After over hearing a seemingly viscous argument between Norman and his mother and eating dinner with Norman, Marion retires to her cabin to take a shower and get some rest. While in the shower, she is attacked without warning by Mrs.Bates, who stabs her to death with a butcher knife. Once he had realized what his mother had done, Norman ran to the bathroom, cleaned up the crime scene (very quickly, almost as if he had done it before...) and pushed Marion's car (that contained the $40,000) into the nearby swamp. 

The remainder of the film follows her boyfriend Sam as he quickly realizes she is missing, and Sam's investigation when the private eye hired to find Marion also disappears (he had been murdered by Mrs. Bates while investigating Marion's disappearance). After Mrs. Bates murdered the private eye, Norman has a fight with her, insisting that she hide down in the fruit cellar until the whole thing settles. She protests, but Norman overpowers her and is shown carrying her down stairs and putting her in the fruit cellar. 

Sam then goes with Marion's sister Lila, to the Bates Motel. While snooping around they find evidence of Marion's stay at the Motel, and begin to search Norman's house. Hearing Norman approaching, Lila panics and runs down to the fruit cellar to hide. She sees Mrs. Bates sitting in a chair, with their back to the camera, facing the corner of the room. She calls her name, but there is no response. Approaching the Mrs. Bates, Lila taps her on her shoulder, causing the figure to fall out of the chair, revealing that it was really Mrs. Bates' corpse lying preserved in the fruit cellar. Seconds later, Norman comes rushing into the room, screaming and holding a butcher knife, dressed like his mother and wearing a wig; revealing that he had been pretending to be Mrs. Bates the entire time while caring around her corpse, imagining that she was alive. Sam comes into the room at the last second, restraining Norman.

After Norman is taken into custody, a psychiatrist explains that Norman had developed an alternate identity, and would sometimes pretend to be his own mother, and would at times carry a conversation with himself. The film ends with a close up of Norman's smiling face, with the voice of Mrs. Bates in the background, and finally a shot of Marion's car being pulled out of the swamp.

One of the many things that makes Psycho especially great is the fluidity with which Hitchcock switches protagonists. I have yet to see a film in which the protagonist changes midway through the story to a completely different person. In the beginning of the movie, Marion is the protagonist. After she is murdered, however, Norman becomes the new protagonist and remains so for the rest of the film. After the infamous shower scene Norman rushes in to clean up the blood and body, and it is during this clean up scene that our loyalty switches to Norman; leaving us to hope that he won't get caught.

The sound track of Psycho is one of the most iconic and infamous of all time. Composed by Bernard Herrman, the score includes screeching violins that consistently match the pace of the film and has now become the classic horror movie sound. It is said that the screeching strings were meant to sound like screaming birds, which segues nicely into my next topic; birds.

Birds are a major motif in Psycho. They are literally everywhere, and become a symbol for Marion. The main character's name in Marion Crane and she is from Phoenix, Arizona, and while she eats with Norman he even tells her that she eats like a bird. In the same scene his office lounge is covered with dead birds and Norman mentions that he likes stuffing birds- possible hinting at what was about to happen in the shower scene only a couple minutes later. Pictures of birds are also shown inside of Marion's hotel room, and after she is murdered Norman runs in and knocks one off of the wall, subtly confirming her death.

One of the basic themes that Hitchcock includes regularly is that of transformation. In the opening scene, Marion is shown with her boyfriend Sam wearing white lingerie (very daring for the time), but later in the film after she stole the $40,000 she is shown wearing black underwear; illustrating her transformation from light to dark that she will pay the ultimate price for. Then, of course, there's Norman- who's transformation is more than that of clothes. His mind literally transforms into a different person to fill the void left by his dead mother. 

Again, I have only touched on the basic key points in Psycho, and later hope to do a more in depth analysis, but this is it for now. This movie has the highest rating out of any movie on the SMS with the exception of one. The rating of 9.8 is given only to Psycho and The Shawshank Redemption, and in my mind represents a near perfect movie. I would love to see a 10, but I'm not sure if that's humanly possible.

This has been a movie review by Severin: the somewhat informed movie critic. Stay safe America, and keep watching movies.

The Last Man on Earth, The Omega Man, and I Am Legend

Hello all,
As promised this post will talk about all three I am Legend movie adaptions (see previous post for context). So, without further ado, this weeks movies are:

The Last Man on Earth, directed by Ubaldo Ragona (1964)


Released in 1964 The Last Man on Earth was the first movie adaption of Richard Matheson's novel I am Legend. Staring Vincent Price, this low budget black and white film is by far the weakest movie spin-off of it's parent novel. It's bone dry acting and linear plot structure made the viewer more tired than anything else.

Because it was filmed in the 1960's the acting is dulled down quite a lot, in this case to the point of utter boredom. It's important to understand that acting in the 60's was very different then what it is now. Vincent Price was stiff and had an extreme lack of emotion, as did his supporting cast. I realize that many people have a prejudice against black and white movies, and it is because of movies like this that that prejudice exists. Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho came out four years before this and was infinitely better; not only because Hitchcock was an undeniable genius but also because it's high-budget cast knew what it was doing. I only mention this so that the people reading who dislike black and white movies won't use this movie to support their case. 

This movie also played much closer to the original story line of Matheson's novel, the main difference being that the infected people were turned into very much self aware vampires as opposed to I am Legend's more animalistic creatures. One of these vampires also turned out to be the main character's friend/lab partner, which added some much needed depth to the characters back story, for this film was lacking some major detail where I am Legend told an amazing origin story which added significantly to the story (i.e. the dramatic death of his family, his dog Sam, and his insanity). Regardless of whether or not these details were included in the original text, I am Legend really benefited from their presence, where The Last Man on Earth failed miserably.

Another thing this movie lacked was a soundtrack. Without the suspense driving and emotional queuing of music this movie seemed to have an enormous hole that sucked in the viewers interest. The silent pauses that occurred so frequently throughout the film did a better job of putting the reader to sleep then capturing their attention.

One thing this movie did right was to drop major hints that the vampires saw Neville as the monster. At the end of the film, just before the character dies he experiences and epiphany where he suddenly realizes that the vampires were afraid of him the entire time, offering the ironic twist ending that I am Legend failed to include.

After watching this movie and writing the review I have decided to give this movie a 4.5 on the Severin Movie Scale (from now on to be known as the SMS). If you are interested by the story then read the book or one of the other movies, just don't see this one.

The Omega Man, directed by Boris Sagal (1971)


Released in 1971, The Omega Man stars Charlton Heston in this second movie adaption of the novel I am Legend. While following a very similar story line, Sagal's version had many more religious undertones than its predecessor and delivered a much more convincing story. 

The opening scene was almost exactly like that of I am Legend, with Charlton Heston speeds through the streets of an empty city in his bright red Mustang, showing Lawrence's subtle homage to the previous film. This is one of the best ways this movie could have started, because it really shows the circumstances of which Dr.Neville lives. Without telling us anything, the viewer already knows that Neville is alone in an abandoned city, is heavily armed and slightly paranoid (he stops the car to shoot at a shadow in the window of a building), and that he is otherwise copping with the fact of being totally alone. 

As previously mentioned, religion is a major motif and underlying theme is this movie. The vampires are still vampires, but they seem to be part of a cult of some sort. They call themselves "The Family" and all dress in black (which might just be because their vampires). They call each other "brother" and more prominently their leaders name is Matthias.

According to the Christian Bible, Matthias was  the apostle chosen to replace Judas by the remaining eleven apostles after Judas' betrayal of Jesus and his suicide. In the film, Matthias frequently reminds his followers  that they were chosen to rise up and take control of the planet as a superior race where humanity had been corrupted in the same way that Matthias was chosen to replace the corrupted apostle Judas.

"The Family" are also shown to have semi-regular gatherings, always to take place in a Church, where Matthias takes the place of the preacher and the rest of "The Family" sit in the pews. Later into the movie, "The Family" captures Neville and brings him to their meeting, unconscious and shackled to a table. After he wakes up, Matthias begins preaching that this human was evil and should be sacrificed to rid the world of the filth of humanity. He talks about how this person was taken by the devil along with the rest of his kind, which is why they are all now dead. This is important because it shows that in this movie, instead of being afraid of him like in the other adaptions, they simply think that he is evil. This also shows striking similarity to the Church as Matthias' monologue begins to sound more and more like a sermon. 

In addition to all of these religious hints, the closing shot is probably the most obvious Christian reference in the entire film. It ends with Neville being killed by the vampires in a fountain outside of his house. As he slowly bleeds out, he falls against the statue in the center of the fountain, his arms splayed outwards in a position eerily similar to the classic depiction of Christ's crucifixion. This could be a symbol saying that "The Family" had just killed their last chance at redemption.

I really enjoyed this movie, and found that while it had it's similarities, that it told a fairly different story than it's sister movies. After long debate I have decided to award this movie with an 8.9 on the SMS, and I highly recommend this title to any who enjoy movies of such taste. 

For a review of the most recent adaption of the novel I am Legend, see my previous post which reviews I am Legend, directed by Francis Lawrence (2007).

This has been a tri-movie review by Severin, the somewhat-informed movie critic. Stay safe America, and keep watching movies.

I am Legend, directed by Francis Lawrence

Welcome back from week 5 of computer programming, this week we talked about problem solving. I enjoyed the mini-activities that we did, where we solved various logic problems. I enjoy figuring out puzzles, so I thought this activity was fun. Speaking of figuring out puzzles, this week's movie is about a Doctor who is the sole survivor of a global plague that killed every human being on Earth, turning some into zombies, and is determined to find a cure to a disease that already wiped out the human population. This week's movie is:

I am Legend, directed by Francis Lawrence




Released in 2007, I am Legend is based off of a book by the same title written by Richard Matheson and has been made into 3 separate movies over the past 57 years of the books publication. It's movie predecessors are The Last Man on Earth, released in 1964 staring Vincent Price and Omega Man, released in 1971 staring Charlton Heston. Keep reading, because before the week is over I will make a 2nd post comparing the 3.

I am Legend is easily one of my favorite movies of all time; here's why.

Will Smith. This was by far his best performance, and he was perfect for the role. Being that he was the only living person on the planet and that he was constantly being hunted by zombies during the hours of the night, the character was a little unstable to begin with. This I thought the movie could have hinted on more, but I thought that the use of manikins to replace real people was an excellent decision to illustrate his level of insanity.

Like in every good movie, there is a companion. In this case it's a dog. Now everybody knows that if there's a dog in a movie then it's probably going to die. In this case, that assumption would be true. But even though you're expecting it, the manner in which it happens is so traumatic that grown men cry at this point in the movie. Many people can die (in this case billions) and the normal movie-goer won't blink an eye; but the moment a dog dies every person is touched with a sadness like none other. In this case, watching a man kill is only friend (who is also a dog) after said dog saved his life is torture. And also the fact that it happens so slowly, it is truly impossible not to be affected by this tear jerking scene. This was really important to the film because not only does it add to the loneliness of the character (Robert Neville), but it also emphasizes what dire circumstance Neville is forced to live under.

This movie also has some of the most suspenseful scenes I've ever seen in a blockbuster movie. Though I'm glad this wasn't a horror movie I think it was necessary to have these points of heightened suspense. It helped reiterate the kind of place the world has become, and what Neville is forced to live with, which bonds you closer with the character.

Yet another thing that this movie did right was to slowly reveal more about the character as the movie went on. As the film progresses, you get a closer and closer look into this man's life, and his personality and reasoning unfold in front of you. The series of flashbacks to the peak of the epidemic add an extra layer to the doctor's story.  His families tragic passing exposes his real motive for trying to cure this disease, and again bonds us closer to the character, which is one of the most important things that a good movie should do.

One of my favorite things about I am Legend was also the soundtrack. Robert Neville is, as it turns out, a huge Bob Marley fan (he even named his daughter Marley). This excites me to no end. Bob Marley is probably my single favorite musician, and his music also serves as an ironic but comforting motif throughout the movie. You begin to see the things that help him get through his day, such as Marley Bob and his dog Sam, and you see how he progresses as those things are taken away one by one.

It's also important to notice when Marley's music is played. In the beginning it's to get you familiar with it, but after that it begins to mean something more. His music quickly becomes a metaphor for peace of mind, played only when Neville and Sam carry out their daily routine. After Neville falls into a trap, Sam sacrifices herself to protect Neville, badly injuring herself in the process. Bob Marley is played when Neville sees that Sam is starting to mutate from the bites of the zombie dogs. He begins to sing "Three little birds" until Sam tries to attack him and he is forced to strangle her. After this major turning point in the movie, Neville suffers an emotional breakdown, and reacts harshly and irrationally in attempt to avenge the death of his dog. Bob Marley ceases to be played. That is until he discovers 2 survivors, a young adult girl and a child boy. He plays "Stir it Up" for the girl after she admits that she doesn't know who Bob Marley is. This is the last time we hear his music in the movie, and is a subtle message that Neville is coming to terms with Sam's death thanks to these 2 new companions.

Finally: the ending. I really admire the courage of the director Francis Lawrence has for killing off his main character. Normally this doesn't happen, or they're some how brought back to life, but I think Lawrence realized that Neville needed to die in order for the film to have any sense of closure. Needless to say, I strongly agree. I think this was the only way that Neville could ever have truly completed his task and to be reunited with his family. I am well aware that this upset many people, but I think that those who were upset by this ending are missing the point and aren't really thinking about what this movie would have been if he had lived. If you were upset by this ending then I think you're thinking with your emotions more than your brain.

The Blu-Ray version of this movie also contains an alternate ending, where Neville lives. While I believe that Neville should have died, this ending did one thing better than the theatrical version. In the original movies as well as the book, the main point of the story was that the zombies were afraid of him. They saw him as the monster; walking around in the daytime, capturing and killing their own kind for no apparent reason (they had no idea of what he was trying to do). I was disappointed that the theatrical version omitted this, but also think that him dying was more important.

After all of this I would give this movie a 9.4 on the Severin scale; showing that this really is an amazing movie.  This has been a review of I am Legend, directed by Francis Lawrence, by Severin, the informed movie critic. Stay safe America, and keep watching movies.

Contagion, directed by Stephen Soderburg

Hey Guys, welcome back from the 4th week in Computer Programming! Yesterday we watch a series of Ted videos covering a wide range of technology related subjects. One of my favorites was when this software developer figured out how to create your own interactive whiteboard using only a Wii remote and a pen. He then extended his concept to make a computer screen respond to the movements of a persons head when wearing special glasses, making the image on the computer appear to be 3 dimensional. To check out these videos go to Ted.com, but in the mean time I have a review of a brand new movie (still in theaters if you wanna see it). This weeks movie is:

Contagion, directed by Stephen Soderburg


This movie just came out on September 9th. Directed by Stephen Soderburg, Contagion is a sci-fi thriller about the massive spread of a lethal virus and the CDC agents who are tasked with controlling it. It also fallows a father who lost the majority of his family to the virus and a lying blogger who is determined to make a fortune off of this epidemic.

First off I want to say that this movie had it's highs and lows. I'll begin with the highs:

To start, I absolutely loved the ways that the camera drew attention to all of the things that the characters touched without even realizing it. The frame would linger on every door handle, glass of water or handshake that occurred in the beginning of the movie. I was sad to see this go, because after about the first half hour it stopped following peoples point of contacts, which I would have like to see continue throughout the film.

*SPOILER ALERT*

Another thing that I really enjoyed was how the movie seemed to take into consideration the different reactions that different people would have in the face of a massively lethal plague. It talks about the father, who's wife and son are killed by disease in the very beginning and who goes to extreme extents to keep his daughter from being exposed. It talked about the CDC agent who wouldn't stop working until she found a cure, and was even willing to test the experimental drugs on herself to speed up the process of human trials. The corrupt and greedy blogger, who pretended to find a cure and sold it for millions of dollars. Even the people who kidnapped another CDC agent and held her as a hostage, demanding enough vaccine for their entire village, and the hostage who even after she was freed, returned to the village again to voluntarily become their hostage. The list goes on and on, and I was really impressed by the amount of thought that the writer (Scott Z. Burns) put into it.

On the other side, I think that Soderburg could have done more. Contagion, contrary to advertisement, is not a thriller movie (which by no means is a bad thing). Instead, it is a slow, creeping and meticulous film about the widespread death of a deadly virus. I for one appreciated this unusual approach to a global catastrophe such as this. It was a welcomed relief to all of the pumped up action in most modern movies. I do, however, think that Soderburg could have made it slightly darker. Don't get me wrong, this movie was in many ways disturbing, but I think that the death of millions of people across the globe deserves something a little more than that. I would have liked for him to put more emphasis on the sheer number of people that died, and what that would mean for the survivors post-vaccine.

Which brings me to my next and final point; the ending. To be honest, I thought that the ending was the worst part of this movie. I found it to be anticlimactic in too many ways. It ends after a cure is found and distributed to the masses by going back to the beginning, showing the origin of the disease. I did enjoy how ironically simple the creation of this elusive, killing virus was, but I did not think that it was an appropriate ending for this title. I think that something more like people rebuilding society after the death of a large portion of the worlds population would have suited this movie better. This ending left me thinking, now what? I think the audience deserved more than that.

Overall I thought that this movie was entertaining and worth seeing, though by no means a flawless film. After a lot of thinking I think I would give Contagion a 7.9 because of the creative story and let down of an ending.

This has been a review of Contagion, directed by Stephen Soderburg, reviewed by Severin-the some-what informed movie critic. Severin signing off. Stay safe America, and keep watching movies.

There will be blood, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson

Welcome to the week of 9/11. I wanted to do a special movie review of the film Flight 93, directed by Peter Markle, to commemorate the 10 year anniversary of the fall of the twin towers, but unfortunately I have yet to see this film and it isn't available on Netflix's instant streaming. It tells the story of the courageous passengers of the 4th plane that was hijacked on 9/11 and how they overcame their terrorist captors and prevented the plane from ever reaching it's destination.

Instead I have another truly amazing film to talk about...this week's movie is:

There will be blood, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson


This movie is really quite amazing. Starring Daniel Day-Lewis, it tells the story of a country oil tycoon and his rise to power during the turn of the century. With his son as his business partner, the prospector slowly looses his mind as his greed and craving for vengeance grow along with his profits, eventually consuming him in his later days.

Released in 2007, There will be blood didn't do great opening weekend, making only about $300,000 (IMDb) but slowly rose to fame and ended up winning two OscarsBest Achievement in Cinematography and Best Performance by and Actor in a Leading Role. 

But enough boring stuff, here's what I think. I was absolutely blown away by the movie. This was the first Daniel Day-Lewis movie that I have ever seen, and I was really impressed with his performance. He did a great job of slowly transitioning from a caring father simply trying to make a living into a power hungry and conniving business man.

As for film making goes, I was also impressed. The first 20 minutes or so are filmed in pure cinema (story telling through film without dialogue), which is pretty rare for a movie these days (my favorite example is the beginning of Wall-E). This movie also does a great job of telling the story from the very beginning, with Daniel silently mining the Earth in search for oil before he had established himself and when is son was only a baby.

Even with all of this going for it, what really made the movie for me was Paul Dano's performance as Eli Sunday, an extremely righteous young pastor who dedication to God is all but loving. It is partly Eli constantly trying to break Daniel and force him into Christianity that drives Daniel over the edge, and they quickly become enemies pitted to destroy each other.

I would give this movie a solid 9.4 on my movie scale, which is pretty good. I would definitely recommend this movie to anyone who asks, Daniel Day and Paul Dano definitely deliver.

Following, directed by Christopher Nolan

I have been in Computer Programming now for 7 hours 25 minutes and 36 seconds total. So far it seems pretty sweet I guess. We haven't really done much yet except for set up these things called blogs. If you don't know what a blog is them you either have Alzheimer's or are one of those weirdos who just browses the web for little to no reason.  Regardless, blogging is pretty cool so far (but that's just cause I like to hear the sound of my own voice... yes I'm talking to myself as I write this).
To be honest I know almost nothing about computers, so most everything we talk about is new to me, which isn't really a bad thing I guess. OK, enough introduction. I am now going to segue into what my true passion is... MOVIES.
Too keep my posts a reasonable length, I will only talk about one movie per post (I could literally talk forever about movies); this weeks movie is:

Following, Directed by Christopher Nolan


Christopher Nolan is probably my favorite director. His movies always seem to blow my mind, and I am determined to watch all of his movies, which is how I stumbled upon this film. Some titles you may recognize that are also by him are FollowingMementoBatman BeginsThe PrestigeThe Dark Knight, and Inception (in that order chronologically). His new movie, The Dark Knight Rises is the end to his Batman trilogy, and is set to release on July 20th of 2012; which I am highly anticipating.

Following was his first movie which came out in 1998. Filmed in black and white, Following tells the story of a starving writer who begins to follow random people to gather information for his characters. It follows him through two time lines that happen simultaneously, similar to Memento. After this continues for a while he becomes addicted to following people and is taken under the wing of a professional burglar, Cobb, who shows him the ropes of breaking and entering. As their relationship grows, the writer, Bill, becomes attached to a woman who's house they broke into and he begins to see her romantically; but this woman is not exactly who Bill thinks she is...

With only a somewhat surprising twist ending, I was somewhat disappointed with this film. Being that Memento came out directly after this one and the similarities of the two story lines, I feel like Following was really just an underdeveloped Memento. The twist at the end, while surprising, was much less daring then that of his other movies such as Memento or The Prestige, or even Inception, all of which had extreme surprises at the end.

After much debate, I would give this movie a 7.9 on my movie scale (from 1-10, 10 being absolutely perfect) but probably would not recommend it to other Nolan fans, being that it doesn't quite live up to his reputation.

This has been a film review of Following, directed by Christopher Nolan, by Severin- the informed movie critic. Severin signing off, stay safe America, and keep watching movies.